Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.
git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills.git--- name: bgpt-paper-search description: Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone. license: MIT compatibility: Requires the BGPT MCP server configured in the agent host (npx mcp-remote or npx bgpt-mcp), internet access to bgpt.pro, and an optional BGPT API key for paid usage. metadata: {"version": "1.1", "skill-author": "BGPT", "website": "https://bgpt.pro/mcp", "github": "https://github.com/connerlambden/bgpt-mcp"} --- # BGPT Paper Search ## Overview BGPT is a remote MCP server that searches a curated database of scientific papers built from raw experimental data extracted from full-text studies. Unlike traditional literature databases that return titles and abstracts, BGPT returns structured data from the actual paper content — methods, quantitative results, sample sizes, quality assessments, and 25+ metadata fields per paper. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when: - Searching for scientific papers with specific experimental details - Conducting systematic or scoping literature reviews - Finding quantitative results, sample sizes, or effect sizes across studies - Comparing methodologies used in different studies - Looking for papers with quality scores or evidence grading - Needing structured data from full-text papers (not just abstracts) - Building evidence tables for meta-analyses or clinical guidelines ## Setup BGPT is a remote MCP server — no local installation required. Configure it in your agent's MCP settings before use; this skill instructs the agent to call the `search_papers` MCP tool and does not enable MCP access by itself. ### Claude Desktop / Claude Code Add to your MCP configuration: ```json { "mcpServers": { "bgpt": { "command": "npx", "args": ["mcp-remote", "https://bgpt.pro/mcp/sse"] } } } ``` ### npm (alternative) ```bash npx bgpt-mcp ``` ## Usage Once the BGPT MCP server is configured, call its `search_papers` tool via the agent's MCP interface (not via Bash): ``` Search for papers about: "CRISPR gene editing efficiency in human cells" ``` The server returns structured results including: - **Title, authors, journal, year, DOI** - **Methods**: Experimental techniques, models, protocols - **Results**: Key findings with quantitative data - **Sample sizes**: Number of subjects/samples - **Quality scores**: Study quality assessments - **Conclusions**: Author conclusions and implications ## Pricing - **Free tier**: 50 searches per network, no API key required - **Paid**: $0.01 per result with an API key from [bgpt.pro/mcp](https://bgpt.pro/mcp)
[{"step":"Install and configure the BGPT MCP server. Ensure you have access to the required API endpoints and authentication tokens.","action":"Follow the BGPT MCP server documentation to set up the connection. Test the connection with a simple query like 'list available fields' to verify functionality.","tip":"Check if your institution or organization has a pre-configured BGPT MCP server endpoint. Many universities and research institutions provide access to this service."},{"step":"Define your search parameters. Use the prompt template to specify your topic, focus area, and desired output format.","action":"Replace [TOPIC] with your research area (e.g., 'mRNA vaccine stability'). Replace [SPECIFIC_ASPECT] with a detailed criterion (e.g., 'thermostability at 37°C'). Replace [USE_CASE] with your intended application (e.g., 'meta-analysis preparation').","tip":"Be as specific as possible with your criteria. For example, instead of 'CRISPR', use 'CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiency in human embryonic stem cells'. This will yield more relevant and structured data."},{"step":"Execute the search and review the structured output. The BGPT MCP server will return data in a standardized format with 25+ fields per paper.","action":"Use the output to identify patterns, quality scores, and experimental details. Highlight papers with quality scores above 8.0 for further review.","tip":"Sort the results by quality score to prioritize the most reliable data. Use the 'conclusion' field to quickly assess the relevance of each paper to your research question."},{"step":"Refine your search based on initial results. Adjust your parameters to focus on gaps or areas of interest identified in the first batch of papers.","action":"Modify your prompt to include additional criteria or exclude irrelevant studies. For example, add 'exclude papers published before 2020' or 'focus on in vivo studies'.","tip":"Use the 'methods' and 'results' fields to identify common experimental approaches. This can help you standardize data extraction for your literature review or meta-analysis."},{"step":"Export and format the data for your specific use case. The structured output can be directly imported into analysis tools like R, Python, or Excel.","action":"Convert the output to CSV or JSON format for easy integration with your analysis pipeline. Use tools like Pandas (Python) or Excel's Power Query to clean and transform the data.","tip":"Create a template for your data extraction to ensure consistency across multiple searches. This will save time and reduce errors when compiling evidence for your research."}]
No install command available. Check the GitHub repository for manual installation instructions.
git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/tree/main/skills/bgpt-paper-searchCopy the install command above and run it in your terminal.
Launch Claude Code, Cursor, or your preferred AI coding agent.
Use the prompt template or examples below to test the skill.
Adapt the skill to your specific use case and workflow.
Use the bgpt-paper-search skill to retrieve structured experimental data for papers about [TOPIC]. Extract all available fields including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Focus on [SPECIFIC_ASPECT] such as [DETAILED_CRITERIA]. Return the data in a structured format suitable for [USE_CASE].
Here is the structured experimental data extracted from 15 recent papers on CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiency in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), focusing on off-target effects and delivery methods: 1. **Paper ID**: 2023_nat_bio_12345 - **Title**: "High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 editing in hESCs with modified sgRNA scaffolds" - **Methods**: Lipid nanoparticle delivery of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs); 4D nucleofection for hESC transfection; off-target analysis via GUIDE-seq - **Sample Size**: 3 experimental replicates (n=500 cells per replicate); control group (n=200 cells) - **Results**: 89.2% editing efficiency (vs. 76.5% in standard sgRNA); off-target events reduced by 94% compared to wild-type Cas9; no detectable chromosomal aberrations - **Quality Score**: 9.1/10 (JBI critical appraisal checklist) - **Conclusion**: Modified sgRNA scaffolds significantly improve editing precision without compromising efficiency in hESCs 2. **Paper ID**: 2023_sci_adv_67890 - **Title**: "Electroporation-mediated CRISPR delivery in hESCs with minimal toxicity" - **Methods**: Neon Transfection System; Cas9 mRNA delivery; T7E1 assay for indel detection - **Sample Size**: 5 experimental groups (n=300 cells each); viability assessed via trypan blue exclusion - **Results**: 82.7% editing efficiency; 92% cell viability post-transfection; no significant differentiation bias - **Quality Score**: 8.7/10 (SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies, adapted for cell lines) - **Conclusion**: Electroporation offers a balance between efficiency and viability for hESC editing Key findings across papers: Off-target rates ranged from 0.1% to 4.2% (median 1.8%) when using high-fidelity Cas9 variants. Delivery methods with >85% efficiency included lipid nanoparticles (89.2%), electroporation (82.7%), and viral vectors (78.3%). All studies reported >90% cell viability post-editing. The most common quality issues were lack of blinding (5 papers) and insufficient sample size justification (3 papers).
skills-collection
Take a free 3-minute scan and get personalized AI skill recommendations.
Take free scan